 | |  | |  | |  | |  |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
 | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  |
| © 2008 - 2011 Nadine Lalich ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. |
| UFOs - ET Contact - Science & Technology - Crop Circles - ESP - Remote Viewing - Brain Technology - Survival Conservation - Earth Preservation - Animal Welfare - Health and Alternative Healing - Spirituality - Personal Growth & Psychology |
| Experiences.com |
| Experiences.com |
| ALIEN |
| ALIEN |
Melinda Leslie
Researcher, Investigator, and Lecturer in the Field of Ufology
Researcher, Investigator, and Lecturer in the Field of Ufology
 | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  | |  |
| 310-502-5398 linnie@onebox.com |
A very random sampling of abductees represents a statistically bigger picture of RE-AB involvement. Even I have a hard
time conceptualizing that eight (adding myself) out of every thirty abductees may have involvement with RE-ABS! Such
numbers would have staggering implications. Even two out of every thirty would be staggering. Even though I’ve lived
with my own RE-AB experiences, I’m constantly amazed at the depth and complexity of the experiences shared by
others. I’ve also noticed that the number of cases seems to be on the rise.
Additionally, I have noticed a denial amongst many abductees much like that of the researchers. As the overall
confusion persists regarding the nature of the MILAB subject, I notice abductees sharing in it. Some of those abductees
move into a state of denial regarding the possibility of their own MILAB experience. I can’t help but wonder if this may be
for the same reasons too. Even more so than the researchers, abductees are concerned about issues of credibility. It’s
understandable that they might shy away from admitting to an experience that could be perceived as somehow
discrediting their ET experience. I understand how difficult it is to accept these experiences. I’ll share one thing I hear
across the board from all the RE-AB cases I’ve worked with. They have all said their mil/intel experiences are more
difficult than their ET ones – harder to experience, harder to come to terms with and harder to live with.
In one such recent example of denial, an abductee expressed to me that she just assumed it was normal for military
personnel to be involved during some of her abductions. It’s funny if you think about it. What could possibly be normal
about seeing military people during your abduction in any capacity whatsoever? I’ve spoken with many RE-ABS who’ve
shared similar sentiments, especially those who’ve experienced only the most minor of surveillance or harassment,
such as phone calls or black helicopters.
I, and other abduction researchers, have cases of military personnel who’ve had ET abductions and sure, seeing
military personnel as other abductees, in the context of being taken themselves by ETs, would make some kind of
sense, but if they appear in the abduction in any other “official” capacity, suddenly the whole paradigm is different.
Additionally, I and other MILAB researchers have military personnel who also have RE-AB experiences while serving –
that is they’ve been abducted by military while in the military.
The involvement of these mil/intel agencies in any aspect of the UFO abduction phenomenon takes the concept of
“cover-up” out into the stratosphere. At that point, we’re well beyond a mere cover-up of information regarding ETs, when
we include a joint participation or collusion between ETs and mil/intel personnel in abduction practices!
Yes, many abductees rationalize their experiences of harassment, surveillance and seeing military personnel as just
“par for the course” in the high-strangeness of their personal experiences. Some of this attitude is understandable
given that it’s hard enough to just come to terms with having ET experiences. Once you wrap your head around that one,
suddenly the presence of military humans doesn’t seem so strange. What you end up with is a comfortable denial of
sorts, regarding the presence of these humans.
Some abductees also find comfort in the view as expressed by Dr. Jacobs, that these experiences are somehow being
perpetrated by ET hybrids who just look human. But one needs to ask, why would hybrids even be wearing human
military uniforms? Many RE-AB abductees have determined they saw authentic military uniforms from specific branches
of service. Also, why would hybrids be flying black helicopters circling repeatedly over our roofs in broad daylight? Why
would hybrids be confronting us in public settings or in front of family or co-workers? Are hybrids monitoring our
phones, tampering with our emails, breaking into homes and offices, and parking in vans on the streets right outside
our front doors? Probably not! Yet, all these occurrences are common in MILAB research.
Once the denial of their military aspects is fully realized by the abductees, they get angry, very angry. After all, it’s one
thing to be abused at the hands of something other (something “alien”), but it’s altogether different at the hands of
humans, let alone humans we’re taught to believe are there to serve, protect, and defend mankind! Unfortunately, the
anger over any human involvement often throws the abductee back into denial of the experience, avoidance of its
implications or causes them to retreat into denial of the ET part of the equation. This may be the cause for why some
RE-AB abductees conclude and think “all my experiences are only the military”. Never mind what caused them to realize
they were having ET experiences to begin with, i.e. the history of their own discovery process that led them to that
conclusion, their evidence for ETs, or the fact that the only reason the military is interested in you is because they want to
know about your ET experiences. And how do we know this? Because, in the interrogations the questions are about the
ETs (why, how, agenda, genetics, psi abilities, technology, etc.), and because they pick up the abductee after they’ve
had…what was that…oh yeah…an ET experience!
It’s actually uncanny. For some abductees, fessing-up to their own RE-AB experiences forces them to re-examine their
ET experiences: to realize that not only were their experiences absolutely real, but that their experiences and they,
themselves, are actually a matter of national security! For the abductee, this is a big pill to swallow. The strategy of
avoidance, reluctance, denial, and an unwillingness to share their experiences with researchers comes much more
easily.
time conceptualizing that eight (adding myself) out of every thirty abductees may have involvement with RE-ABS! Such
numbers would have staggering implications. Even two out of every thirty would be staggering. Even though I’ve lived
with my own RE-AB experiences, I’m constantly amazed at the depth and complexity of the experiences shared by
others. I’ve also noticed that the number of cases seems to be on the rise.
Additionally, I have noticed a denial amongst many abductees much like that of the researchers. As the overall
confusion persists regarding the nature of the MILAB subject, I notice abductees sharing in it. Some of those abductees
move into a state of denial regarding the possibility of their own MILAB experience. I can’t help but wonder if this may be
for the same reasons too. Even more so than the researchers, abductees are concerned about issues of credibility. It’s
understandable that they might shy away from admitting to an experience that could be perceived as somehow
discrediting their ET experience. I understand how difficult it is to accept these experiences. I’ll share one thing I hear
across the board from all the RE-AB cases I’ve worked with. They have all said their mil/intel experiences are more
difficult than their ET ones – harder to experience, harder to come to terms with and harder to live with.
In one such recent example of denial, an abductee expressed to me that she just assumed it was normal for military
personnel to be involved during some of her abductions. It’s funny if you think about it. What could possibly be normal
about seeing military people during your abduction in any capacity whatsoever? I’ve spoken with many RE-ABS who’ve
shared similar sentiments, especially those who’ve experienced only the most minor of surveillance or harassment,
such as phone calls or black helicopters.
I, and other abduction researchers, have cases of military personnel who’ve had ET abductions and sure, seeing
military personnel as other abductees, in the context of being taken themselves by ETs, would make some kind of
sense, but if they appear in the abduction in any other “official” capacity, suddenly the whole paradigm is different.
Additionally, I and other MILAB researchers have military personnel who also have RE-AB experiences while serving –
that is they’ve been abducted by military while in the military.
The involvement of these mil/intel agencies in any aspect of the UFO abduction phenomenon takes the concept of
“cover-up” out into the stratosphere. At that point, we’re well beyond a mere cover-up of information regarding ETs, when
we include a joint participation or collusion between ETs and mil/intel personnel in abduction practices!
Yes, many abductees rationalize their experiences of harassment, surveillance and seeing military personnel as just
“par for the course” in the high-strangeness of their personal experiences. Some of this attitude is understandable
given that it’s hard enough to just come to terms with having ET experiences. Once you wrap your head around that one,
suddenly the presence of military humans doesn’t seem so strange. What you end up with is a comfortable denial of
sorts, regarding the presence of these humans.
Some abductees also find comfort in the view as expressed by Dr. Jacobs, that these experiences are somehow being
perpetrated by ET hybrids who just look human. But one needs to ask, why would hybrids even be wearing human
military uniforms? Many RE-AB abductees have determined they saw authentic military uniforms from specific branches
of service. Also, why would hybrids be flying black helicopters circling repeatedly over our roofs in broad daylight? Why
would hybrids be confronting us in public settings or in front of family or co-workers? Are hybrids monitoring our
phones, tampering with our emails, breaking into homes and offices, and parking in vans on the streets right outside
our front doors? Probably not! Yet, all these occurrences are common in MILAB research.
Once the denial of their military aspects is fully realized by the abductees, they get angry, very angry. After all, it’s one
thing to be abused at the hands of something other (something “alien”), but it’s altogether different at the hands of
humans, let alone humans we’re taught to believe are there to serve, protect, and defend mankind! Unfortunately, the
anger over any human involvement often throws the abductee back into denial of the experience, avoidance of its
implications or causes them to retreat into denial of the ET part of the equation. This may be the cause for why some
RE-AB abductees conclude and think “all my experiences are only the military”. Never mind what caused them to realize
they were having ET experiences to begin with, i.e. the history of their own discovery process that led them to that
conclusion, their evidence for ETs, or the fact that the only reason the military is interested in you is because they want to
know about your ET experiences. And how do we know this? Because, in the interrogations the questions are about the
ETs (why, how, agenda, genetics, psi abilities, technology, etc.), and because they pick up the abductee after they’ve
had…what was that…oh yeah…an ET experience!
It’s actually uncanny. For some abductees, fessing-up to their own RE-AB experiences forces them to re-examine their
ET experiences: to realize that not only were their experiences absolutely real, but that their experiences and they,
themselves, are actually a matter of national security! For the abductee, this is a big pill to swallow. The strategy of
avoidance, reluctance, denial, and an unwillingness to share their experiences with researchers comes much more
easily.
It’s no wonder that the MILAB subject is overlooked by the abduction research community, and almost completely ignored by the ufology community. It turns out that ET
development, is more important and more deeply entrenched than has ever been recognized, and thus plays a more integral role than has been previously known.
I’m not really trying to get anyone to change the name – to replace one acronym with another. Many say that ufology has too many acronyms as it is. Even I’ll continue to
occasionally call the phenomenon “MILAB” out of sheer habit.
The actual problem is not the name, but the paradigm. I am asking that ufology expand its current abduction paradigm to include an even greater appreciation for the
reality and significance of the abduction phenomenon as it relates to the overall UFO subject. And in particular, appreciation of the fact that abductees are being reverse-
engineered by the military and/or intelligence ET management cabal to access many forms of ET information and for all the benefits and possibilities that information
holds. Ufology must shift its paradigm to include that abductees are being reverse-engineered because these experiences are an indispensible and integral part of the
picture, the complete UFO and ET presence realty picture, that abductees are reverse-engineered in experiences known as MILABS…I mean…RE-ABS.
Melinda Leslie has been public with her own abduction experiences for 20 years, researched covert-ops involvement for 17 years, and interviewed over 50 abductees
with this involvement. Melinda's research is featured in the new book, Camouflage Through Limited Disclosure: Deconstructing a Cover-up of the Extraterrestrial
Presence by Randy Koppang. Melinda has lectured for numerous organizations and conferences, including MUFON, the X-Conference, the Bay Area UFO Expo, UFO
Expo West, the International UFO Congress, the Whole Life Expo, and more. She has been a guest on numerous radio shows including Coast-to-Coast AM, and
appeared on several television shows. For 9 years Melinda was Director of a UFO lecture series hosting the most prominent names in ufology. Melinda may be reached
at Linnie@onebox.com.
development, is more important and more deeply entrenched than has ever been recognized, and thus plays a more integral role than has been previously known.
I’m not really trying to get anyone to change the name – to replace one acronym with another. Many say that ufology has too many acronyms as it is. Even I’ll continue to
occasionally call the phenomenon “MILAB” out of sheer habit.
The actual problem is not the name, but the paradigm. I am asking that ufology expand its current abduction paradigm to include an even greater appreciation for the
reality and significance of the abduction phenomenon as it relates to the overall UFO subject. And in particular, appreciation of the fact that abductees are being reverse-
engineered by the military and/or intelligence ET management cabal to access many forms of ET information and for all the benefits and possibilities that information
holds. Ufology must shift its paradigm to include that abductees are being reverse-engineered because these experiences are an indispensible and integral part of the
picture, the complete UFO and ET presence realty picture, that abductees are reverse-engineered in experiences known as MILABS…I mean…RE-ABS.
Melinda Leslie has been public with her own abduction experiences for 20 years, researched covert-ops involvement for 17 years, and interviewed over 50 abductees
with this involvement. Melinda's research is featured in the new book, Camouflage Through Limited Disclosure: Deconstructing a Cover-up of the Extraterrestrial
Presence by Randy Koppang. Melinda has lectured for numerous organizations and conferences, including MUFON, the X-Conference, the Bay Area UFO Expo, UFO
Expo West, the International UFO Congress, the Whole Life Expo, and more. She has been a guest on numerous radio shows including Coast-to-Coast AM, and
appeared on several television shows. For 9 years Melinda was Director of a UFO lecture series hosting the most prominent names in ufology. Melinda may be reached
at Linnie@onebox.com.
| Articles by Melinda Leslie |